By Adam Liptak; The New York Times ~ Nov 10, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seemed puzzled on Monday about why it was being asked to decide whether a chemical company could cut the health benefits of its retired workers.
“This is an important benefit and an expensive one,” said Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. He would have expected, he said, that the issue would have been resolved in the company’s contract with the union.
“Why is it that in this collective bargaining agreement and apparently many others,” he asked, “there isn’t anything explicit one way or the other?”
